What is the significance of the case of Griswold v Connecticut?

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) The U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court struck down a law that prohibited married couples from using birth control. In so doing, the Court affirmed that the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees a right to privacy, even though it does not explicitly say so.
Who are appellants Griswold and Buxton?
Appellant Griswold is Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut. Appellant Buxton is a licensed physician and a professor at the Yale Medical School who served as Medical Director for the League at its Center in New Haven—a center open and operating from November 1 to November 10, 1961, when appellants were arrested.

Who was Estelle Griswold?

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) Estelle Griswold, executive director of the Planned Parenthood League, standing outside the center on April, 1963. (Source: Time & Life pictures, Lee Lockwood, via Wikimedia Commons, public domain)
How did the Griswold ruling affect birth control?
Thanks in part to the ruling in Griswold v. Connecticut, and the possibilities the decision created, birth control has had a dramatic impact on individuals and families in this country — allowing people to invest in their futures and their careers and giving them time to plan for their families.

Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects the liberty of married couples to buy and use contraceptives without government restriction.
What was the significance of the Comstock v Connecticut case?
Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), is a landmark case in the United States about access to contraception. The case involved a Connecticut " Comstock law " that prohibited any person from using "any drug, medicinal article or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception.". The court held that the statute was…

What happened to Greg Griswold and Joanna Buxton?

Griswold served as Executive Director. Both Buxton and Griswold were arrested and convicted as "accessories" under a state statute for giving out information medical advice and instruction to married couples on how to prevent conception. The Connecticut state statute prevented the use of or assistance in preventing contraception.